- Kindergarten
- Greater Than Less Than
- Measurement
- Multiplication
- Place Value
- Subtraction
- Punctuation
- 1st Grade Reading
- 2nd Grade Reading
- 3rd Grade Reading
- Cursive Writing
- Alphabet Coloring
- Animals Coloring
- Birthday Coloring
- Boys Coloring
- Buildings Coloring
- Cartoons Coloring
- Christmas Coloring
- Country Flag Coloring
- Country Map Coloring
- Disney Coloring
- Fantasy Coloring
- Food Coloring
- Girls Coloring
- Holidays Coloring
- Music Coloring
- Nature Coloring
- New Year Coloring
- People Coloring
- Religious Coloring
- Sports Coloring
- Toys Coloring
- Transportation Coloring
- US Sports Team Coloring
- Valentine Day Coloring

Rubrics In Performance Tasks Grade 3
Displaying top 8 worksheets found for - Rubrics In Performance Tasks Grade 3 .
Some of the worksheets for this concept are Performance task general rubric, Grade 3 ela rubrics final, Grade 3 mathematics, Grade 3 informational performance task, Exemplars science alignments, Third grade, Grade 3 assessment in reading, Grade 3 module 1 performance task.
Found worksheet you are looking for? To download/print, click on pop-out icon or print icon to worksheet to print or download. Worksheet will open in a new window. You can & download or print using the browser document reader options.
1. Performance Task General Rubric -
2. grade 3 ela rubrics final, 3. grade 3 mathematics pt.final -, 4. grade 3 informational performance task -, 5. exemplars science alignments, 6. third grade, 7. grade 3 assessment in reading, 8. grade 3: module 1 performance task.
You are here
- Design Assessment
A rubric is a learning and assessment tool that articulates the expectations for assignments and performance tasks by listing criteria, and for each criteria, describing levels of quality (Andrade, 2000; Arter & Chappuis, 2007; Stiggins, 2001). Rubrics contain four essential features (Stevens & Levi, 2013):

A description of performance quality give students a clear idea about what must be done to demonstrate a certain level of mastery, understanding, or proficiency (i.e., "excellent" does xyz, "fair" does only xy or yz, "poor" does only x or y or z). Rubrics can be used for any assignment in a course, or for any way in which you ask students to demonstrate what they've learned. They can also be used to facilitate self and peer-reviews of student work.
A rubric can be analytic or holistic. An analytic rubric articulates different dimensions of performance and provides ratings for each dimension. A holistic rubric describes the overall characteristics of a performnace and provides a single score. Here are some pros and cons:

2. Why You Should Consider Rubrics
Rubrics help instructors :
- Provide students with feedback that is clear, directed and focused on ways to improve learning.
- Demystify assignment expectations so students can focus on the work instead of guessing "what the teacher wants."
- Adapt your approach to teaching aspects of a course based on thematic gaps in student learning that are easily identified by reviewing rubrics across a class.
- Develop consistency in how you evaluate student learning across students and throughout a class.
- Reduce time spent on grading; Increase time spent on teaching.
Rubrics help students :
- Focus their efforts on completing assignments in line with clearly set expectations.
- Self and Peer-reflect on their learning, making informed changes to achieve the desired learning level.
3. Getting Started with Rubrics
STEP 1: Clarify task/performance expectations.
STEP 2: Identify the characteristics of student performances. What is it that students are supposed to demonstrate (skills, knowledge, behaviors, etc.)? [components/dimensions]
STEP 3: Identify how many mastery levels are needed for each performance component/dimension. Decide what score should be allocated for each level. [scale]
STEP 4: Describe performance characteristics of each component/dimension for each mastery level. [performance descriptor]
STEP 5: Pilot-test the rubric with a few sample papers and/or get feedback from your colleagues (and students) on the rubric. Revise the rubric.
4. Rater Training and Calibrartion
In order to provide consistent and reliable rating, those who will be rating student work or performance need to be familiar with the rubric and need to interpret and apply the rubric in the same way. To calibrate ratings among raters, a rating orientation can be useful.
Steps involved in rater training and calibration:
Step 1: Explain how to use the rubric. Familiarize faculty with the categories and levels. For each mastery level, provide one sample with annotations of the features found in student work that capture the rating criteria.
Step 2: Provide two samples of student performance/work that represents different levels of mastery (mask the ratings). Have faculty rate them independently applying the rubric.
Step 3: Gather faculty’s ratings to show the agreement on the rating.
Step 4: Discuss scoring inconsistencies and reasons behind different ratings. Revise/clarify the rubric, if necessary.
Step 5: Once consensus is made on the ratings and when faculty feel comfortable with using the rubric, proceed with individual ratings of student work/performance. Provide faculty with rating sheet and explain the procedure (e.g., two raters for one sample).
5. Rubric Examples
Sample rubrics from berkeley faculty: .
- Sociology Department: Writing assessment rubric
- Sociology Department: Rubric for Grading an Analytical Essay , from Sociology Department
- Rubric for Evaluating Written Assignments (pdf)
- International and Area Studies: Honors Thesis Rubric
- International and Area Studies: Honors Thesis Evaluation Form
- Sample Research Paper, Annotated Bibliography, and Reflection
Other rubric samples:
- Group presentation rubric (UC Davis): http://dhc.ucdavis.edu/includes/pdf/Group_Research_Presentations_Rubric.pdf (link is external)
- Research paper rubric (George Mason University): http://ctfe.gmu.edu/teaching/grading/sample-rubric-for-grading-a-research-paper/ (link is external)
- Lab report rubric (University of Michigan): http://www.crlt.umich.edu/gsis/p7_11 (link is external)
- Dissertation proposal rubric (Purdue University): http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/ira/assess/pdf/Purdue_PhD_DissertationRubric.pdf (link is external)
- AAC&U VALUE rubrics (Rubrics on: Civic Engagement, Creative Thinking, Critical Thinking, Ethical Reasoning, Information Literacy, Inquiry Analysis, Integrative Learning, Intercultural Competence, Lifelong Learning, Oral Communication, Problem Solving, Quantitative Literacy, Global Learning, Reading, Teamwork, Written Communication): http://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/pdf/All_Rubrics.pdf (link is external)
- University of Maryland: http://openedpractices.org/files/CT%20and%20research%20Univ.%20of%20MD%20CTE.pdf (link is external)
- Rubric for Integration of Student Learning Assessment into Program Reviews
- Rubric for Assessing the Quality of Academic Program Learning Outcomes
- Rubric for Assessing the Use of Portfolios for Assessing Program Learning Outcomes
- Rubric for Evalutating General Education Assessment Process
- The Educational Effectiveness Framework: Capacity & Effectiveness as They Relate to Student and Institutional Learning
- Rubric for Assessing the use of Capstone Experiences for Assessing Program Learning Outcomes
Grade 3 Performance Tasks for 3rd Quarter Free Download
- February 10, 2022
- Performance Tasks , Quarter 3
This post is a compilation of Grade 3 performance tasks for 3rd quarter, school year 2021-2022.
Since quizzes and periodic examinations are no longer feasible under the blended learning framework, the Department of Education has revised its assessment and grading policy for basic education students.
Teacher Tayo Downloadables Compilation
Classroom recitations, quizzes and frequent tests were crucial elements of the learning process of students. But the recent change to distance learning modalities has made it impossible to administer, if not entirely obsolete, these traditional assessment tools.
Restrictions levied because of the coronavirus pandemic contributed to a massive reform of the worldwide education system.
For DepEd, the blended learning approach will make education more accessible: learning will still continue for students through written modules or class episodes, broadcast on television or radio without access to required gadgets and secure internet connectivity.
This setup, however, also presents difficulties, such as the need for a versatile evaluation and grading system that takes into account the various learning modalities chosen by the students.
DepEd issued the interim guidelines for the evaluation and grading of students this school year on Oct. 4, the day before the opening of classes, taking into account the current learning setup for Filipino students.
“Distance learning poses challenges for teachers and learners in the conduct of assessment, including limitations on giving immediate feedback, and the need to account for different contexts in designing, implementing and grading assessment tasks,” the policy read.
“Schools must adopt assessment and grading practices that can most meaningfully support student development and respond to varied contexts at this time,” it added.

Grade 3 Performance Tasks for 3rd Quarter
- Grade 3 Performance Tasks for 3rd Quarter: AP: DOWNLOAD
- Grade 3 Performance Tasks for 3rd Quarter: English: DOWNLOAD
- Grade 3 Performance Tasks for 3rd Quarter: ESP: DOWNLOAD
- Grade 3 Performance Tasks for 3rd Quarter: Filipino: DOWNLOAD
- Grade 3 Performance Tasks for 3rd Quarter: MAPEH: DOWNLOAD
- Grade 3 Performance Tasks for 3rd Quarter: Math: DOWNLOAD
- Grade 3 Performance Tasks for 3rd Quarter: Science: DOWNLOAD
DOWNLOAD MORE:
Written works and performance task.
16. To evaluate student learning at particular points in each quarter, summative assessments shall continue in the form of written works and performance tasks.
a. Written works shall be administered to assess essential knowledge and understandings through quizzes and long/unit tests. Items should be distributed across the Cognitive Process Dimensions (DepEd, 2015, p. 4) using a combination of selected-response and constructed- response formats so that all are adequately covered.
b. Performance tasks refer to assessment tasks that “allow learners to show what they know and are able to do in diverse ways. They may create or innovate products or do performance-based tasks [including] skill demonstrations, group presentations, oral work, multimedia presentations, and research projects. It is important to note that written outputs may also be considered as performance tasks” (DepEd, 2015, pp. 7–8). Annex B provides a list of sample summative assessments that fall under performance task for the purpose of this policy.
17. Performance tasks must be designed to provide opportunities for learners to apply what they are learning to real-life situations. In addition, teachers should take into consideration the following:
a. Each task must be accompanied with clear directions and appropriate scoring tools (i.e. checklists, rubrics, rating scale, etc.) to help learners demonstrate their learning (see Annex C for sample scoring tools).
b. Teachers are advised to collaboratively design and implement performance tasks that integrate two or more competencies within or across subject areas. Complex tasks may be broken down into shorter tasks to be completed over longer periods of time (see Annex D for sample integrative assessment tasks).
c. Learners must be given flexibility in the accomplishment of the performance tasks to consider time and resources available to them. Nonetheless, all learners within a class should be assessed on the same competencies using the same scoring tool.
d. Teachers must exercise their professional judgment in carrying out summative assessments, providing enough opportunities for learners to practice and to redo their work whenever necessary, so that they can reach their learning targets with the least amount of pressure.
18. Teachers should set realistic expectations and use their professional judgment to find a good balance between what is effective and what is feasible to accomplish remotely.
Reference/Source: DO No. 031 s. 2020
Disclaimer: These Grade 3 Performance Tasks for 3rd Quarter are files that are shared in the internet and were not originally made by Teacher Tayo. This post is created for information, education and dissemination purposes only, NO copyright infringement intended, for more questions and inquiries contact us through our Facebook page, @teachertayo.
Grade 3 Performance Tasks for 3rd Quarter – scroll up to download
What is Teacher Tayo?
Teacher Tayo is an online website with the domain, www.teachertayo.com, created to help provide downloadables to teachers and to inform them of the latest news and happening regarding education. Teacher Tayo aims to be the number one source of free downloadable teacher’s materials in hopes to lessen the workload of our teachers.
Basic Troubleshooting
If the download link is not working properly you may be loading an old cache of the page. To solve the problem please refresh the page by PRESSING F5 . Shall you need further assistance? Please email us at [email protected] .
Teacher Tayo Community
LIKE our Facebook PAGE and SHARE this post to your timeline to help our fellow teachers who need these materials. JOIN! our growing community and fellowship with thousands of teachers all around the country. Teacher Tayo is not just a mere site it’s a movement towards a better Philippines.
RECOMMENDED
One comment, leave a reply cancel reply.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Name *
Email *
Add Comment
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Post Comment

3RD QUARTER PERFORMANCE TASKS (With RUBRICS) Updated!

Search This Blog
- Activity Sheets
- Automated IPCRF
- Brigada Eskwela Forms and Tarpaulin
- Budget or Work
- Bulletin Board Displays
- Certificates
- Classroom Decoration
- Classroom Structuring
- COT Lesson Plans
- Daily Lesson Log
- DepEd Advisory
- DepEd E-Class Record
- DepEd Forms
- DepEd Modified E-Class Record
- DepEd Official Statement
- DepEd Order
- DepEd Press Release
- DepEd TV Lesson Episodes
- DepEd VIsion Mission Core Values
- Detailed Lesson Plans
- Diagnostic Test
- Educational Games
- English IMs
- Enrollment Forms
- Filipino IMs
- Free Webinars
- Free Webinars. Tutorials
- Grade 1 Activity Sheets
- Grade 10 Activity Sheets
- Grade 11 Activity Sheets
- Grade 12 Activity Sheets
- Grade 2 Activity Sheets
- Grade 3 Activity Sheets
- Grade 4 Activity Sheets
- Grade 5 Activity Sheets
- Grade 6 Activity Sheets
- Grade 7 Activity Sheets
- Grade 8 Activity Sheets
- Grade 9 Activity Sheets
- Handwriting Worksheets
- Homeroom Guidance Modules
- In-Service Training for Teachers
- Individual Learning Monitoring Plan
- Inspiring Stories
- Instructional Materials
- Item Analysis Automated Template
- LDM Practicum Portfolio
- LDM2 Teacher's Portfolio
- Learners Materials
- Learning Activity Sheets (LAS)
- Lesson Exemplars (MELC-Based)
- Mathematics IMs
- MELC-Based MODULES
- Monthly Celebration
- Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELC)
- Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs)
- NDEP/GAD/DRRM Corners
- Nutritional Status Template
- Other Materials
- Performance Tasks
- Periodical Test (Quarter 1)
- Periodical Test (Quarter 2)
- Reading Articles
- Reading Materials
- Revised PDS (CS Form 212)
- RPMS Portfolio
- RPMS-PPST Materials
- School Effectiveness Toolkit
- School Form 9 (SF9)
- School Forms
- School Signage
- Science IM's
- Self-Learning Modules
- Self-Monitoring Tool
- STUDY NOTEBOOKS for LDM2
- Summative Tests
- Teacher's Forms
- Teacher's Guide
- Teacher's Materials
- Thinking Log for Learners
- Weekly Home Learning Plan
- Weekly Learning Plan
- Weekly Tests
Popular Posts

Recent Posts
- Privacy Policy
- Terms and Conditions
Rubric Best Practices, Examples, and Templates
Instructors have many tasks to perform during the semester, including grading assignments and assessments. Feedback on performance is a critical factor in helping students improve and succeed. Grading rubrics can provide more consistent feedback for students and create efficiency for the instructor/grader.
A rubric is a scoring tool that identifies the different criteria relevant to an assignment, assessment, or learning outcome and states the possible levels of achievement in a specific, clear, and objective way. Use rubrics to assess project-based student work, including essays, group projects, creative endeavors, and oral presentations. Rubrics are helpful for instructors because they can help them communicate expectations to students and assess student work fairly and efficiently. Finally, rubrics can provide students with informative feedback on their strengths and weaknesses so that they can reflect on their performance and work on areas that need improvement.
How to Get Started
Best practices, moodle how-to guides.
- Workshop Recording (Fall 2022)
- Workshop Registration
Step 1: Define the Purpose
The first step in the rubric-creation process is to define the purpose of the assignment or assessment for which you are creating a rubric. To do this, consider the following questions:
- What is the assignment?
- Does the assignment break down into different or smaller tasks?
- Are these tasks equally important as the main assignment?
- What are the learning objectives for the assignment?
- What do you want students to demonstrate through the completion of this assignment?
- What would an excellent assignment look like?
- How would you describe an acceptable assignment?
- How would you describe an assignment that falls below expectations?
- What kind of feedback do you want to give students for their work?
- Do you want/need to give them a grade? If so, do you want to give them a single overall grade or detailed feedback based on a variety of criteria?
- Do you want to give students specific feedback that will help them improve their future work?
Step 2: Decide What Kind of Rubric You Will Use
Types of rubrics: holistic, analytic/descriptive, single-point
Holistic Rubric. A holistic rubric consists of a single scale with all the criteria to be included in the evaluation (such as clarity, organization, mechanics, etc.) being considered together. With a holistic rubric, the rater or grader assigns a single score (usually on a 1-4 or 1-6 point scale) based on an overall judgment of the student’s work. The rater matches an entire piece of student work to a single description on the scale.
Advantages of holistic rubrics:
- Place an emphasis on what learners can demonstrate rather than what they cannot
- Save time by minimizing the number of decisions to be made
- Can be used consistently across raters, provided they have all been trained
Disadvantages of holistic rubrics:
- Do not provide specific feedback for improvement
- Can be difficult to choose a score when a student’s work is at varying levels across the criteria
- Criteria cannot be weighted
Analytic/Descriptive Rubric . An analytic rubric resembles a grid with the criteria for an assignment listed in the left column and with levels of performance listed across the top row, often using numbers and/or descriptive tags. The cells within the center of the rubric may be left blank or may contain descriptions of what the specified criteria look like for each level of performance. When scoring with an analytic rubric, each of the criteria is scored individually.
Advantages of analytic rubrics:
- Provide feedback on areas of strength or weakness
- Each criterion can be weighted to reflect its relative importance
Disadvantages of analytic rubrics:
- More time-consuming to create and use than a holistic rubric
- May not be used consistently across raters unless the rubrics are well defined
- May limit personalized feedback to help students improve
Single-Point Rubric . Similar to an analytic/descriptive rubric in that it breaks down the components of an assignment into different criteria. The detailed performance descriptors are only for the level of proficiency. Feedback space is provided for instructors to give individualized comments to help students improve and/or show where they excelled beyond the proficiency descriptors.
Advantages of single-point rubrics:
- Easier to create than an analytic/descriptive rubric
- More likely that students will read the descriptors
- Areas of concern and excellence are open-ended removes a focus on the grade/points
- May increase student creativity in project-based assignments
- Requires more work for instructors writing feedback
Step 3: Define the Criteria
Ask yourself: What knowledge and skills are required for the assignment/assessment? Make a list of these, group and label them, and eliminate any that are not critical.
Helpful strategies for defining grading criteria:
- Review the learning objectives for the course; use the assignment prompt, existing grading checklists, peer response sheets, comments on previous work, past examples of student work, etc.
- Try describing A/B/C work.
- Consider “sentence starters” with verbs describing student performance from Bloom’s Taxonomy or other terms to indicate various levels of performance, i.e., presence to absence, complete to incomplete, many to some to none, major to minor, consistent to inconsistent, always to usually to sometimes to rarely
- Collaborate with co-instructors, teaching assistants, and other colleagues
- Brainstorm and discuss with students
- Can they be observed and measured?
- Are they important and essential?
- Are they distinct from other criteria?
- Are they phrased in precise, unambiguous language?
- Revise the criteria as needed
- Consider how you will weigh them in relation to each other
Step 4: Design the Rating Scale
Most ratings scales include between 3 and 5 levels. Consider the following questions:
- Given what students are able to demonstrate in this assignment/assessment, what are the possible levels of achievement?
- Will you use numbers or descriptive labels for these levels?
- If you choose descriptive labels, what labels are most appropriate? Will you assign a number to those labels?
- In what order will you list these levels — from lowest to highest or vice versa?
Step 5: Write Descriptions for Each Level of the Rating Scale
Create statements of expected performance at each level of the rubric. For an analytic rubric, do this for each particular criterion of the rubric. These descriptions help students understand your expectations and their performance in regard to those expectations.
Start with the top/exemplary work category –what does it look like when a student has achieved excellence in each category? Then look at the “bottom” category –what does it look like when students have not achieved the learning goals in any way? Then add the categories in between.
Also, take into consideration that well-written descriptions:
- Describe observable and measurable behavior
- Use parallel language across the scale
- Indicate the degree to which the standards are met
Step 6: Create your Rubric
- Develop the criteria, rating scale, and descriptions for each level of the rating scale into a rubric
- Include the assignment at the top of the rubric, space permitting
- For reading and grading ease, limit the rubric to a single page, if possible
- Consider the effectiveness of your rubric and revise accordingly
- Create your rubric in a table or spreadsheet in Word, Google Docs, Sheets, etc., and then transfer it by typing it into Moodle. You can also use online tools to create the rubric, but you will still have to type the criteria, indicators, levels, etc., into Moodle. Rubric creators: Rubistar , iRubric
Step 7: Pilot-test your Rubric
Prior to implementing your rubric on a live course, obtain feedback from:
- Teacher Assistants
Also, try out your new rubric on a sample of student work. After you pilot-test your rubric, analyze the results to consider its effectiveness and revise accordingly.
- Use Parallel Language . Make sure that the language from column to column is similar and that syntax and wording correspond. Of course, the words will change for each section or assignment, as will the expectations, but in terms of readability, make sure that the rubric can be easily read from left to right or vice versa. In addition, if you have an indicator described in one category, it will need to be described in the next category, whether it is about “having included” or “not having included” something. This is all about clarity and transparency to students.
- Use Student-Friendly Language . If students can’t understand the rubric, it will not be useful for guiding instruction, reflection, and assessment. If you want students to engage in using the rubric, they have to understand it. Make sure the language is learning-level appropriate. If you use academic language or concepts, you will need to teach those concepts.
- Use the Rubric with Your Students . You have to use the rubric with the students. It means nothing to them if you don’t. For students to find the rubric useful in terms of their learning, they must see a reason for using it. Students should understand that the rubric is there to help them learn, reflect, and self-assess. If students use a rubric, they will understand the expectations and their relevance to learning.
- Don’t Use Too Many Columns . The rubric needs to be comprehensible and organized. Pick the right amount of columns so that the criteria flow logically and naturally across levels.
- Common Rubrics and Templates are Awesome . Avoid rubric fatigue, as in creating rubrics to the point where you just can’t do it anymore. This can be done with common rubrics that students see across multiple classroom activities and through creating templates that you can alter slightly as needed. Design those templates for learning targets or similar performance tasks in your classroom. It’s easy to change these types of rubrics later. Figure out your common practices and create a single rubric your team can use.
- Rely on Descriptive Language. The most effective descriptions are those that use specific descriptions. This means avoiding words like “good” and “excellent.” At the same time, don’t rely on numbers, such as a number of resources, as your crutch. Instead of saying, “find excellent sources” or “use three sources,” focus your rubric language on the quality use of whatever sources students find and on the best possible way of aligning that data to the work. It isn’t about the number of sources, and “excellent” is too vague for students. Be specific and descriptive.
Example of an analytic rubric for a final paper
Example of a holistic rubric for a final paper, single-point rubric.

- Single Point Rubric Template ( variation )
- Analytic Rubric Template make a copy to edit
- A Rubric for Rubrics
- Single Point Discussion Rubric
- Mathematical Presentations Descriptive Rubric
- Math Proof Assessment Rubric
- Kansas State Sample Rubrics
- Design Single Point Rubric
Technology Tools: Rubrics in Moodle
- Moodle Docs: Rubrics
- Moodle Docs: Grading Guide (use for single-point rubrics)
Supplemental Tools with Rubrics in Moodle
- Google Assignments
- Turnitin Assignments: Rubric or Grading Form
- DELTA – Rubrics: Making Assignments Easier for You and Your Students (2/1/2022)
- DePaul University (n.d.). Rubrics. Retrieved from http://resources.depaul.edu/teaching-commons/teaching-guides/feedback-grading/rubrics/Pages/default.aspx
- Gonzalez, J. (2014). Know your terms: Holistic, Analytic, and Single-Point Rubrics. Cult of Pedagogy. Retrieved from https://www.cultofpedagogy.com/holistic-analytic-single-point-rubrics/
- Goodrich, H. (1996). Understanding rubrics. Teaching for Authentic Student Performance, 54 (4), 14-17. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/dec96/vol54/num04/Understanding-Rubrics.aspx
- Miller, A. (2012). Tame the beast: tips for designing and using rubrics. Retrieved from http://www.edutopia.org/blog/designing-using-rubrics-andrew-miller
- Ragupathi, K., Lee, A. (2020). Beyond Fairness and Consistency in Grading: The Role of Rubrics in Higher Education. In: Sanger, C., Gleason, N. (eds) Diversity and Inclusion in Global Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1628-3_3
- Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning
- Instructional Guide
- Rubrics for Assessment
A rubric is an explicit set of criteria used for assessing a particular type of work or performance (TLT Group, n.d.) and provides more details than a single grade or mark. Rubrics, therefore, will help you grade more objectively.
Have your students ever asked, “Why did you grade me that way?” or stated, “You never told us that we would be graded on grammar!” As a grading tool, rubrics can address these and other issues related to assessment: they reduce grading time; they increase objectivity and reduce subjectivity; they convey timely feedback to students and they improve students’ ability to include required elements of an assignment (Stevens & Levi, 2005). Grading rubrics can be used to assess a range of activities in any subject area
Elements of a Rubric
Typically designed as a grid-type structure, a grading rubric includes criteria, levels of performance, scores, and descriptors which become unique assessment tools for any given assignment. The table below illustrates a simple grading rubric with each of the four elements for a history research paper.
Criteria identify the trait, feature or dimension which is to be measured and include a definition and example to clarify the meaning of each trait being assessed. Each assignment or performance will determine the number of criteria to be scored. Criteria are derived from assignments, checklists, grading sheets or colleagues.
Examples of Criteria for a term paper rubric
- Introduction
- Arguments/analysis
- Grammar and punctuation
- Internal citations
Levels of performance
Levels of performance are often labeled as adjectives which describe the performance levels. Levels of performance determine the degree of performance which has been met and will provide for consistent and objective assessment and better feedback to students. These levels tell students what they are expected to do. Levels of performance can be used without descriptors but descriptors help in achieving objectivity. Words used for levels of performance could influence a student’s interpretation of performance level (such as superior, moderate, poor or above or below average).
Examples to describe levels of performance
- Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor
- Master, Apprentice, Beginner
- Exemplary, Accomplished, Developing, Beginning, Undeveloped
- Complete, Incomplete
Levels of performance determine the degree of performance which has been met and will provide for consistent and objective assessment and better feedback to students.
Scores make up the system of numbers or values used to rate each criterion and often are combined with levels of performance. Begin by asking how many points are needed to adequately describe the range of performance you expect to see in students’ work. Consider the range of possible performance level.
Example of scores for a rubric
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 2, 4, 6, 8
Descriptors
Descriptors are explicit descriptions of the performance and show how the score is derived and what is expected of the students. Descriptors spell out each level (gradation) of performance for each criterion and describe what performance at a particular level looks like. Descriptors describe how well students’ work is distinguished from the work of their peers and will help you to distinguish between each student’s work. Descriptors should be detailed enough to differentiate between the different level and increase the objectivity of the rater.
Descriptors...describe what performance at a particular level looks like.
Developing a Grading Rubric
First, consider using any of a number of existing rubrics available online. Many rubrics can be used “as is.” Or, you could modify a rubric by adding or deleting elements or combining others for one that will suit your needs. Finally, you could create a completely customized rubric using specifically designed rubric software or just by creating a table with the rubric elements. The following steps will help you develop a rubric no matter which option you choose.
- Select a performance/assignment to be assessed. Begin with a performance or assignment which may be difficult to grade and where you want to reduce subjectivity. Is the performance/assignment an authentic task related to learning goals and/or objectives? Are students replicating meaningful tasks found in the real world? Are you encouraging students to problem solve and apply knowledge? Answer these questions as you begin to develop the criteria for your rubric.
Begin with a performance or assignment which may be difficult to grade and where you want to reduce subjectivity.
- List criteria. Begin by brainstorming a list of all criteria, traits or dimensions associated task. Reduce the list by chunking similar criteria and eliminating others until you produce a range of appropriate criteria. A rubric designed for formative and diagnostic assessments might have more criteria than those rubrics rating summative performances (Dodge, 2001). Keep the list of criteria manageable and reasonable.
- Write criteria descriptions. Keep criteria descriptions brief, understandable, and in a logical order for students to follow as they work on the task.
- Determine level of performance adjectives. Select words or phrases that will explain what performance looks like at each level, making sure they are discrete enough to show real differences. Levels of performance should match the related criterion.
- Develop scores. The scores will determine the ranges of performance in numerical value. Make sure the values make sense in terms of the total points possible: What is the difference between getting 10 points versus 100 points versus 1,000 points? The best and worst performance scores are placed at the ends of the continuum and the other scores are placed appropriately in between. It is suggested to start with fewer levels and to distinguish between work that does not meet the criteria. Also, it is difficult to make fine distinctions using qualitative levels such as never, sometimes, usually or limited acceptance, proficient or NA, poor, fair, good, very good, excellent. How will you make the distinctions?
It is suggested to start with fewer [score] levels and to distinguish between work that does not meet the criteria.
- Write the descriptors. As a student is judged to move up the performance continuum, previous level descriptions are considered achieved in subsequent description levels. Therefore, it is not necessary to include “beginning level” descriptors in the same box where new skills are introduced.
- Evaluate the rubric. As with any instructional tool, evaluate the rubric each time it is used to ensure it matches instructional goals and objectives. Be sure students understand each criterion and how they can use the rubric to their advantage. Consider providing more details about each of the rubric’s areas to further clarify these sections to students. Pilot test new rubrics if possible, review the rubric with a colleague, and solicit students’ feedback for further refinements.
Types of Rubrics
Determining which type of rubric to use depends on what and how you plan to evaluate. There are several types of rubrics including holistic, analytical, general, and task-specific. Each of these will be described below.
All criteria are assessed as a single score. Holistic rubrics are good for evaluating overall performance on a task. Because only one score is given, holistic rubrics tend to be easier to score. However, holistic rubrics do not provide detailed information on student performance for each criterion; the levels of performance are treated as a whole.
- “Use for simple tasks and performances such as reading fluency or response to an essay question . . .
- Getting a quick snapshot of overall quality or achievement
- Judging the impact of a product or performance” (Arter & McTighe, 2001, p 21)
Each criterion is assessed separately, using different descriptive ratings. Each criterion receives a separate score. Analytical rubrics take more time to score but provide more detailed feedback.
- “Judging complex performances . . . involving several significant [criteria] . . .
- Providing more specific information or feedback to students . . .” (Arter & McTighe, 2001, p 22)
A generic rubric contains criteria that are general across tasks and can be used for similar tasks or performances. Criteria are assessed separately, as in an analytical rubric.
- “[Use] when students will not all be doing exactly the same task; when students have a choice as to what evidence will be chosen to show competence on a particular skill or product.
- [Use] when instructors are trying to judge consistently in different course sections” (Arter & McTighe, 2001, p 30)
Task-specific
Assesses a specific task. Unique criteria are assessed separately. However, it may not be possible to account for each and every criterion involved in a particular task which could overlook a student’s unique solution (Arter & McTighe, 2001).
- “It’s easier and faster to get consistent scoring
- [Use] in large-scale and “high-stakes” contexts, such as state-level accountability assessments
- [Use when] you want to know whether students know particular facts, equations, methods, or procedures” (Arter & McTighe, 2001, p 28)
Grading rubrics are effective and efficient tools which allow for objective and consistent assessment of a range of performances, assignments, and activities. Rubrics can help clarify your expectations and will show students how to meet them, making students accountable for their performance in an easy-to-follow format. The feedback that students receive through a grading rubric can help them improve their performance on revised or subsequent work. Rubrics can help to rationalize grades when students ask about your method of assessment. Rubrics also allow for consistency in grading for those who team teach the same course, for TAs assigned to the task of grading, and serve as good documentation for accreditation purposes. Several online sources exist which can be used in the creation of customized grading rubrics; a few of these are listed below.
Arter, J., & McTighe, J. (2001). Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance criteria for assessing and improving student performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2005). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback, and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
The Teaching, Learning, and Technology Group (n.d.). Rubrics: Definition, tools, examples, references. http://www.tltgroup.org/resources/flashlight/rubrics.htm
Selected Resources
Dodge, B. (2001). Creating a rubric on a given task. http://webquest.sdsu.edu/rubrics/rubrics.html
Wilson, M. (2006). Rethinking rubrics in writing assessment. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Rubric Builders and Generators
eMints.org (2011). Rubric/scoring guide. http://www.emints.org/webquest/rubric.shtml
General Rubric Generator. http://www.teach-nology.com/web_tools/rubrics/general/
RubiStar (2008). Create rubrics for your project-based learning activities. http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php

Suggested citation
Northern Illinois University Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning. (2012). Rubrics for assessment. In Instructional guide for university faculty and teaching assistants. Retrieved from https://www.niu.edu/citl/resources/guides/instructional-guide
- Active Learning Activities
- Assessing Student Learning
- Direct vs. Indirect Assessment
- Examples of Classroom Assessment Techniques
- Formative and Summative Assessment
- Peer and Self-Assessment
- Reflective Journals and Learning Logs
- The Process of Grading
Phone: 815-753-0595 Email: [email protected]
Connect with us on
Facebook page Twitter page YouTube page Instagram page LinkedIn page
- Facebook Group
- Facebook Page
- e-SLM vesion2

Most Downloaded
- Daily Time Record (eDTR)
- Electronic Class Record
- Enhanced BEEF
- Enrollment Form 2022-2023
- Learning Activity Sheets
- New Sick Leave Form 6
- RPMS Tools and Forms
- School Calendar 2021-22
- School Calendar 2022-2023
- Self-Learning Modules (SLM)
- Teachers Guide 2021-22
- Your 700+ PowerPoint Templates
Ready Made Rubric Assessment Tools for Performance Task
What is a rubric.

Holistic rubrics
Analytic rubrics, here are examples of ready made rubric assessment tools that you can use in assessing the performance task you give to your learners..
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Research Report
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Story Writing
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Cooking Presentation
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Letter Writing
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Building a Structure
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Group Presentation
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Problem Solving in Math
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Class Debate
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Math Graphing
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Creating a Painting
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Independent Reading
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Poem Recitation
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Poster Making
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Interview
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Music
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Reading Comprehension
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Folk Dance
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Essay Writing
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Role Playing
- Rubric Assessment Tool for Skit/Role Playing

No comments
Post a Comment
Social Counter
- facebook count=667 K Follow
Featured Post
Multi-year rpms-ppst tools and guidelines for classroom observation.
Multi-Year RPMS-PPST Tools and Guidelines for Classroom Observation For SY 2022-2023, only two (2) classroom observations are required, ...

DLL Q1-4 Free Downloads
- Grade 1 DLL, Q1 - Q4
- Grade 2 DLL, Q1 - Q4
- Grade 3 DLL, Q1 - Q4
- Grade 4 DLL, Q1 - Q4
- Grade 5 DLL, Q1 - Q4
- Grade 6 DLL, Q1 - Q4
Popular Posts

- DepEd releases multi-year guidelines on the RPMS-PPST DepEd releases multi-year guidelines on the RPMS-PPST FEB 0 3 2023 DepEd MEMORANDUM No. 008 s. 2023 MULTI-YEAR GUIDELINES ON THE RESULTS-...
DOWNLOADABLE RESOURCES
- Budget of Work
- Detailed Lesson Plan
- enhanced enrollment form
- Enhanced TIP Course Books
- learning activity sheet
- Modules with answer key
- Quarterly Assessment
- Reading Materials
- Remedial Reading
- Rubric Assessment Tools
- school calendar 2021-2022
- school calendar 2022-2023
- Self-Learning Modules
- Summative Test
LATEST ISSUANCES
Deped updates, teacher resources.
- Inside Mathematics
- Math Pathways (DCMP)
- Keywords Search
- performance assessment tasks
Performance Assessment Tasks
These tasks are grade-level formative performance assessment tasks with accompanying scoring rubrics and discussion of student work samples. They are aligned to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. You may download and use these tasks for professional development purposes without modifying the tasks.
The tasks for 3rd Grade through High School were developed by the Mathematics Assessment Resource Service (MARS) of the Shell Centre for Mathematical Education, University of Nottingham, England. The tasks for 2nd Grade were developed by the Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative’s Mathematics Assessment Collaborative (MAC).
View 2nd-grade tasks:
View 3rd-grade tasks:
View 4th-grade tasks:
View 5th-grade tasks:
View 6th-grade tasks:
View 7th-grade tasks:
View 8th-grade tasks:
View High School Algebra I tasks:
View High School Geometry tasks:
View High School Algebra II tasks:
Copyright 2023 The Charles A. Dana Center The University of Texas at Austin Site by Mighty Citizen
DepEdLPs Club
Teaching made easy, performance tasks for grades 1-6 quarter 2 for all subjects with rubrics.
December 12, 2020 depedteachersclub Performance Tasks 36

In this page we will share to you for FREE to DOWNLOAD Second Quarter, “DepEd Performance Tasks for Grades 1-6 in Complete Subjects”.
- Performance Tasks
Since quizzes and periodical examinations no longer feasible under the blended learning situation, the Department of Education (DepEd) has changed its assessment and grading policy for students in basic education. Prior to the pandemic, classroom recitations, quizzes and periodical examinations were indispensable aspects of the learning process.
But the newly shift to distance learning modalities has rendered these traditional assessment tools difficult to administer, if not totally obsolete.
Limitations are imposed due to the corona-virus pandemic led to a major revamp of the education system globally, including in the Philippines.
The new situation shows challenges, such as the need to have a flexible assessment and grading system that takes into account the different learning modalities chosen by the students.
“Distance learning poses challenges for teachers and learners in the conduct of assessment, including limitations on giving immediate feedback, and the need to account for different contexts in designing, implementing and grading assessment tasks,” the policy read. “Schools must adopt assessment and grading practices that can most meaningfully support student development and respond to varied contexts at this time,” it added.
These performance task assessments shall be included to the Self-Learning Modules ( SLMs ) that will be sent to the learners. Other divisions scheduled to send these tasks separately. All Performance task assessments results shall be recorded and will appear to the records of every learner.
NOTE: YOU CAN ALSO DOWNLOAD COMPLETE QUARTER 1 PERFORMANCE TASKS JUST CLICK HERE
To Download PERFORMANCE TASK to be recorded for the Second Quarter, Simply click on the following links below.
Grade 1 performance tasks for quarter 2 all subjects
Grade 2 performance tasks for quarter 2 all subjects
Grade 3 performance tasks for quarter 2 all subjects
Grade 4 performance tasks for quarter 2 all subjects
Grade 5 performance tasks for quarter 2 all subjects
Grade 6 performance tasks for quarter 2 all subjects
Grade 6 performance tasks for quarter 2 all subjects RUBRICS
Please also note that we are currently updating this page to complete the files, just come back later.
CREDIT TO THE RIGHTFUL OWNERS
YOU MAY ALSO DOWNLOAD MOST ESSENTIAL LEARNING TEACHING MATERIALS
- Weekly Home Learning Plans 1st-4th Quarter in Complete Subjects for Grades 1-6
- Self Learning Modules for Grades 1-12 all Subjects All Quarters
- Complete daily lesson log DLL G1-6
- Complete PowerPoint Lesson Plan G1-6
- Complete Learning and Teaching Materials for Junior – Senior High
- Contextualize Lesson Plans for Kinder, Grades 1-10
- MELC’s for All Subjects
- Official Workweek Plan Templates
Be the first to be informed, Please like our Facebook Page here
Disclaimer: This post is created for information, education and dissemination purposes only, NO copyright infringement intended, for more questions and inquiries contact us at [email protected]

13 Comments on Performance Tasks for Grades 1-6 Quarter 2 for All Subjects with RUBRICS
hope ma download na ang grade 3
we will do our best po comeback from time to time to check for updates.
THANK YOU FOR SHARING ME THE PERFORMANCE TASK.IT HELP ME A LOT..GOD BLESS
Thank you so much!!! God bless
Thank you so much,nakakatulong talaga.imformative indeed..
Salamat po paki share naman po sa facebook para mas marami papong matulongan.
Thank you very much. Bakit po walang Filipino Grade 4?
thank you so much po y lacking of filipino and PE po sa Q1 and PE s Q 2? God bless po
Thank you very much po, Bakit walang Filipino Grade 4?
thank you for sharing your work God bless you
Please Share!
Thank you so much admin for the shared knowledge i got in this educational group system this will help a lot in my teaching and to the learners as well. thank you & God bless everyone.
Salamat, malaking tulong ang depedlps.club organizer at ang mga content dito ay 100% nakakatulong sa lahat ng mga guro at magulang/mag-aaral. Ipagpatuloy po ito. Thank you – organizer of depedlps.club. It is very helpful to all of us teachers. God bless.
23 Trackbacks & Pingbacks
- Quarter 3 Performance Tasks for Grades 1-6 All Subjects
- DepEd Quarter 3 Performance Tasks for Grades 1-6 All Subjects - Deped Teachers Club
- GSIS to cancel the ‘Questionable’ accrued interests on loans for the months of ECQ last year
- On DepEd's bid to open new school year on August 23: ACT
- Eligibility Requirements on the Grant of Mid-year 2021 Bonus
- Face to Face classes resumption possible by August
- 4th Quarter Self-Learning Modules (SLMs) from Kinder, to Grades 1-12 in All Subjects
- Performance Based Bonus (PBB 2019) Update as of May 1, 2021
- Weekly Home Learning Plan (WHLP) Quarter 3 Week 7 Grade 1-6 Complete All Subjects
- DepEd PBB release getting worse through the years – ACT
- PBB 2019 will be downloaded directly ROs, School-based Personnel 1st to Receive their Bonuses
- R.A 10653 Tax Exemption of 13th Month Pay and Other Bonuses
- Regular Holiday May 13, 2021, in Observance of Eid'l Fitr
- DepEd considers September as the Opening of Classes for the SY 2021-2022
- Comelec shows "positive response" on DepEd request for higher poll watchers’ pay
- PBB 2019 Update as of May 21, 2021
- Public schools nationwide can conduct their graduation and moving up rites in July - DepEd
- New Issuance of DepEd & DBM Aims to Increase Special Hardship Allowance of Teachers
- Performance based bonus (PBB 2019) Update, SARO is now Uploaded by DBM
- Updates & Directives for PBB 2019 & 2020, DepEd's Official Statement
- 2019 PBB UPDATE as of June 1, 2021 - NAPIRMAHAN NA ANG PBB 2019
- New AO No. 43 grants P500 hazard pay to government employees rendered duty during MECQ from April 12 to May 14/May 31
- Quarter 4 Performance Tasks for Grades 1-6 All Subjects
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published.
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
- Faculty and Staff

Assessment and Curriculum Support Center
Creating and using rubrics.
On this page:
Part 1. What is a rubric? Part 2. Why use a rubric? Part 3. What are the parts of a rubric? Part 4. Developing a rubric Part 5. Sample rubrics Part 6. Scoring rubric group orientation and calibration Part 7. Suggestions for Using Rubrics in Courses Part 8. Tips for developing a rubric
Rubric examples:
- Rubrics primarily for undergraduate outcomes and programs
- Rubric repository for graduate degree programs
Workshop presentation slides and handouts:
- Workshop handout (Word document)
- How to Use a Rubric for Program Assessment (2010)
- Techniques for Using Rubrics in Program Assessment by guest speaker Dannelle Stevens (2010)
- Rubrics: Save Grading Time & Engage Students in Learning by guest speaker Dannelle Stevens (2009)
1. What is a rubric?
A rubric is an assessment tool often shaped like a matrix, which describes levels of achievement in a specific area of performance, understanding, or behavior.
There are two main types of rubrics:
Analytic Rubric : An analytic rubric specifies at least two characteristics to be assessed at each performance level and provides a separate score for each characteristic (e.g., a score on “formatting” and a score on “content development”).
- Advantages: provides more detailed feedback on student performance; promotes consistent scoring across students and between raters
- Disadvantages: more time consuming than applying a holistic rubric
- You want to see strengths and weaknesses.
- You want detailed feedback about student performance.
Holistic Rubric: A holistic rubrics provide a single score based on an overall impression of a student’s performance on a task.
- Advantages: quick scoring; provides an overview of student achievement; efficient for large group scoring
- Disadvantages: does not provided detailed information; not diagnostic; may be difficult for scorers to decide on one overall score
- You want a quick snapshot of achievement.
- A single dimension is adequate to define quality.
2. Why use a rubric?
- A rubric creates a common framework and language for assessment.
- Complex products or behaviors can be examined efficiently.
- Well-trained reviewers apply the same criteria and standards.
- Rubrics are criterion-referenced, rather than norm-referenced. Raters ask, “Did the student meet the criteria for level 5 of the rubric?” rather than “How well did this student do compared to other students?”
- Using rubrics can lead to substantive conversations among faculty.
- When faculty members collaborate to develop a rubric, it promotes shared expectations and grading practices.
Faculty members can use rubrics for program assessment. Examples:
The English Department collected essays from students in all sections of English 100. A random sample of essays was selected. A team of faculty members evaluated the essays by applying an analytic scoring rubric. Before applying the rubric, they “normed”–that is, they agreed on how to apply the rubric by scoring the same set of essays and discussing them until consensus was reached (see below: “6. Scoring rubric group orientation and calibration”). Biology laboratory instructors agreed to use a “Biology Lab Report Rubric” to grade students’ lab reports in all Biology lab sections, from 100- to 400-level. At the beginning of each semester, instructors met and discussed sample lab reports. They agreed on how to apply the rubric and their expectations for an “A,” “B,” “C,” etc., report in 100-level, 200-level, and 300- and 400-level lab sections. Every other year, a random sample of students’ lab reports are selected from 300- and 400-level sections. Each of those reports are then scored by a Biology professor. The score given by the course instructor is compared to the score given by the Biology professor. In addition, the scores are reported as part of the program’s assessment report. In this way, the program determines how well it is meeting its outcome, “Students will be able to write biology laboratory reports.”
3. What are the parts of a rubric?
Rubrics are composed of four basic parts. In its simplest form, the rubric includes:
- A task description . The outcome being assessed or instructions students received for an assignment.
- The characteristics to be rated (rows) . The skills, knowledge, and/or behavior to be demonstrated.
- Not meeting, approaching, meeting, exceeding
- Exemplary, proficient, marginal, unacceptable
- Advanced, intermediate high, intermediate, novice
- A description of each characteristic at each level of mastery/scale (cells) .
4. Developing a rubric
Step 1: Identify what you want to assess
Step 2: Identify the characteristics to be rated (rows). These are also called “dimensions.”
- Specify the skills, knowledge, and/or behaviors that you will be looking for.
- Limit the characteristics to those that are most important to the assessment.
Step 3: Identify the levels of mastery/scale (columns).
Tip: Aim for an even number (4 or 6) because when an odd number is used, the middle tends to become the “catch-all” category.
Step 4: Describe each level of mastery for each characteristic/dimension (cells).
- Describe the best work you could expect using these characteristics. This describes the top category.
- Describe an unacceptable product. This describes the lowest category.
- Develop descriptions of intermediate-level products for intermediate categories.
Important: Each description and each characteristic should be mutually exclusive.
Step 5: Test rubric.
- Apply the rubric to an assignment.
- Share with colleagues.
Tip: Faculty members often find it useful to establish the minimum score needed for the student work to be deemed passable. For example, faculty members may decided that a “1” or “2” on a 4-point scale (4=exemplary, 3=proficient, 2=marginal, 1=unacceptable), does not meet the minimum quality expectations. We encourage a standard setting session to set the score needed to meet expectations (also called a “cutscore”). Monica has posted materials from standard setting workshops, one offered on campus and the other at a national conference (includes speaker notes with the presentation slides). They may set their criteria for success as 90% of the students must score 3 or higher. If assessment study results fall short, action will need to be taken.
Step 6: Discuss with colleagues. Review feedback and revise.
Important: When developing a rubric for program assessment, enlist the help of colleagues. Rubrics promote shared expectations and consistent grading practices which benefit faculty members and students in the program.
5. Sample rubrics
Rubrics are on our Rubric Bank page and in our Rubric Repository (Graduate Degree Programs) . More are available at the Assessment and Curriculum Support Center in Crawford Hall (hard copy).
These open as Word documents and are examples from outside UH.
- Group Participation (analytic rubric)
- Participation (holistic rubric)
- Design Project (analytic rubric)
- Critical Thinking (analytic rubric)
- Media and Design Elements (analytic rubric; portfolio)
- Writing (holistic rubric; portfolio)
6. Scoring rubric group orientation and calibration
When using a rubric for program assessment purposes, faculty members apply the rubric to pieces of student work (e.g., reports, oral presentations, design projects). To produce dependable scores, each faculty member needs to interpret the rubric in the same way. The process of training faculty members to apply the rubric is called “norming.” It’s a way to calibrate the faculty members so that scores are accurate and consistent across the faculty. Below are directions for an assessment coordinator carrying out this process.
Suggested materials for a scoring session:
- Copies of the rubric
- Copies of the “anchors”: pieces of student work that illustrate each level of mastery. Suggestion: have 6 anchor pieces (2 low, 2 middle, 2 high)
- Score sheets
- Extra pens, tape, post-its, paper clips, stapler, rubber bands, etc.
Hold the scoring session in a room that:
- Allows the scorers to spread out as they rate the student pieces
- Has a chalk or white board, smart board, or flip chart
- Describe the purpose of the activity, stressing how it fits into program assessment plans. Explain that the purpose is to assess the program, not individual students or faculty, and describe ethical guidelines, including respect for confidentiality and privacy.
- Describe the nature of the products that will be reviewed, briefly summarizing how they were obtained.
- Describe the scoring rubric and its categories. Explain how it was developed.
- Analytic: Explain that readers should rate each dimension of an analytic rubric separately, and they should apply the criteria without concern for how often each score (level of mastery) is used. Holistic: Explain that readers should assign the score or level of mastery that best describes the whole piece; some aspects of the piece may not appear in that score and that is okay. They should apply the criteria without concern for how often each score is used.
- Give each scorer a copy of several student products that are exemplars of different levels of performance. Ask each scorer to independently apply the rubric to each of these products, writing their ratings on a scrap sheet of paper.
- Once everyone is done, collect everyone’s ratings and display them so everyone can see the degree of agreement. This is often done on a blackboard, with each person in turn announcing his/her ratings as they are entered on the board. Alternatively, the facilitator could ask raters to raise their hands when their rating category is announced, making the extent of agreement very clear to everyone and making it very easy to identify raters who routinely give unusually high or low ratings.
- Guide the group in a discussion of their ratings. There will be differences. This discussion is important to establish standards. Attempt to reach consensus on the most appropriate rating for each of the products being examined by inviting people who gave different ratings to explain their judgments. Raters should be encouraged to explain by making explicit references to the rubric. Usually consensus is possible, but sometimes a split decision is developed, e.g., the group may agree that a product is a “3-4” split because it has elements of both categories. This is usually not a problem. You might allow the group to revise the rubric to clarify its use but avoid allowing the group to drift away from the rubric and learning outcome(s) being assessed.
- Once the group is comfortable with how the rubric is applied, the rating begins. Explain how to record ratings using the score sheet and explain the procedures. Reviewers begin scoring.
- Are results sufficiently reliable?
- What do the results mean? Are we satisfied with the extent of students’ learning?
- Who needs to know the results?
- What are the implications of the results for curriculum, pedagogy, or student support services?
- How might the assessment process, itself, be improved?
7. Suggestions for Using Rubrics in Courses
- Use the rubric to grade student work. Hand out the rubric with the assignment so students will know your expectations and how they’ll be graded. This should help students master your learning outcomes by guiding their work in appropriate directions.
- Use a rubric for grading student work and return the rubric with the grading on it. Faculty save time writing extensive comments; they just circle or highlight relevant segments of the rubric. Some faculty members include room for additional comments on the rubric page, either within each section or at the end.
- Develop a rubric with your students for an assignment or group project. Students can the monitor themselves and their peers using agreed-upon criteria that they helped develop. Many faculty members find that students will create higher standards for themselves than faculty members would impose on them.
- Have students apply your rubric to sample products before they create their own. Faculty members report that students are quite accurate when doing this, and this process should help them evaluate their own projects as they are being developed. The ability to evaluate, edit, and improve draft documents is an important skill.
- Have students exchange paper drafts and give peer feedback using the rubric. Then, give students a few days to revise before submitting the final draft to you. You might also require that they turn in the draft and peer-scored rubric with their final paper.
- Have students self-assess their products using the rubric and hand in their self-assessment with the product; then, faculty members and students can compare self- and faculty-generated evaluations.
8. Tips for developing a rubric
- Find and adapt an existing rubric! It is rare to find a rubric that is exactly right for your situation, but you can adapt an already existing rubric that has worked well for others and save a great deal of time. A faculty member in your program may already have a good one.
- Evaluate the rubric . Ask yourself: A) Does the rubric relate to the outcome(s) being assessed? (If yes, success!) B) Does it address anything extraneous? (If yes, delete.) C) Is the rubric useful, feasible, manageable, and practical? (If yes, find multiple ways to use the rubric: program assessment, assignment grading, peer review, student self assessment.)
- Collect samples of student work that exemplify each point on the scale or level. A rubric will not be meaningful to students or colleagues until the anchors/benchmarks/exemplars are available.
- Expect to revise.
- When you have a good rubric, SHARE IT!
Sources consulted:
- Rubric Library , Institutional Research, Assessment & Planning, California State University-Fresno
- The Basics of Rubrics [PDF], Schreyer Institute, Penn State
- Creating Rubrics , Teaching Methods and Management, TeacherVision
- Allen, Mary – University of Hawai’i at Manoa Spring 2008 Assessment Workshops, May 13-14, 2008 [available at the Assessment and Curriculum Support Center]
- Mertler, Craig A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation , 7(25).
- NPEC Sourcebook on Assessment: Definitions and Assessment Methods for Communication, Leadership, Information Literacy, Quantitative Reasoning, and Quantitative Skills . [PDF] (June 2005)
Writing Rubrics
Samples of basic, expository, and narrative rubrics.
- Grading Students for Assessment
- Lesson Plans
- Becoming A Teacher
- Assessments & Tests
- Elementary Education
- Special Education
- Homeschooling
Rubric Basics
How to score a rubric, basic writing rubric, narrative writing rubric, expository writing rubric.
- M.S., Education, Buffalo State College
- B.S., Education, Buffalo State College
An easy way to evaluate student writing is to create a rubric . A rubric is a scoring guide that helps teachers evaluate student performance as well as a student product or project. A writing rubric allows you, as a teacher, to help students improve their writing skills by determining what areas they need help in.
To get started in creating a rubric, you must:
- Read through the students' writing assignment completely.
- Read each criterion on the rubric and then reread the assignment, this time focusing on each feature of the rubric .
- Circle the appropriate section for each criterion listed. This will help you score the assignment at the end.
- Give the writing assignment a final score.
To learn how to turn a four-point rubric into a letter grade, use the basic writing rubric below as an example. The four-point rubric uses four potential points the student can earn for each area, such as 1) strong, 2) developing, 3) emerging, and 4) beginning. To turn your rubric score into a letter grade, divide the points earned by the points possible.
Example: The student earns 18 out of 20 points. 18/20 = 90 percent; 90 percent = A
Suggested Point Scale :
88-100 = A 75-87 = B 62-74 = C 50-61 = D 0-50 = F
- Create Rubrics for Student Assessment - Step by Step
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():format(webp)/Biography-pix-58acb80e3df78c345ba5ac66.jpg)
By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
- Arts & Music
- English Language Arts
- World Language
- Social Studies - History
- Holidays / Seasonal
- Independent Work Packet
- Easel by TPT
- Google Apps
Interactive resources you can assign in your digital classroom from TPT.

Easel Activities

Easel Assessments
Unlock access to 4 million resources — at no cost to you — with a school-funded subscription..
performance task rubric
All Formats
Resource types, all resource types, results for performance task rubric.
- Price (Ascending)
- Most Recent

NGSS Science Multi-Rubric

Common Core Math Performance Task for 1st Grade with Rubric

6th Grade Math Performance Task

Extreme Weather Performance Task Assessment

SBAC Secondary ELA Performance Task Simplified Writing Rubrics + Checklists

Also included in: SBAC Secondary ELA MEGA Bundle #MarchMiddleMadness

ELA Performance Task - Ancient Egypt

Distance Learning Language Arts Performance Task with Editable Google Doc

Linear Equations Performance Task

Also included in: Linear Equations Activities Bundle

4th Grade Common Core - Math Place Value - Performance Task Assessment

World Language Comprehensible Input Performance Task Rubrics Printable

Also included in: French Family Friend Relationship Life Stage Conversation Vocab Culture BUNDLE

5th Grade Math Constructed Response for the ENTIRE YEAR, CCSS Performance Tasks

Performance Task: Grade 5 (Narrative)

Fables Performance Task Writing Rubric

Quadrilateral Monster Performance Task - {3.G.A.1}

Handwriting Rubrics - PreK Through Grade 8

Performance Task: Grade 4 (Narrative)

Performance Task Assessment: Quadratic Functions and Vertical Motion

Create A Creature Animal Adaptation Ecosystem Performance Task Project-DIGITAL

Performance Task Assessment: Polynomial Functions

Performance Task for 4.MD.A.1 All measurement on 4th Grade Sci Test

- Word Document File

Exponential Functions Performance Task with Rubric

*PARCC Test Prep Pack for Writing Performance Based Prompts (4th-5th grades)

ELA Performance Task SBAC Prep... TPT Digital Beta Ready

- Easel Activity
Also included in: ELA Performance Task SBAC Bundle

ELA Performance Task - Endangered Animals
TPT empowers educators to teach at their best.
- We're Hiring
- Help & FAQ
- Terms of Service
- Trademark & Copyright
- Privacy Policy
- Student Privacy Policy
Keep in Touch!
Are you getting the free resources, updates, and special offers we send out every week in our teacher newsletter?

Just one more step to access this resource!
Get your free sample task today.
Ready to explore Exemplars rich performance tasks? Sign up for your free sample now.
Grade 3 Math Samples
Non-common core, common core, teks (for texas), place value unit.
- Unit Description
Home Towns in Texas
Students use inequality symbols to compare the home town populations of three teams and round population numbers to the nearest hundreds place to determine which team has the greatest combined rounded population.
Insects in Jars
Rounding to the nearest 10, students determine how many insects are let go from glass jars.
The Place Value Unit involves understanding and representing the relative position, magnitude and relationships within the numeration system in order to answer questions such as:
- How can you use the additive property of place value (expanded notation) to decompose the number 54,321? (50,000 + 4,000 + 300 + 20 + 1)
- How can you use the base ten property of place value to explain the relationship between each of the digits in the number 55,555? (Each number is worth 10 times the number to its right and one-tenth the number to its left.)
- How can you use the multiplicative property of place value to describe the meaning of each digit in the number 54,321? (Since the 4 is in the thousands place, multiplying the 4 times 1,000 gives the value of the 4 in the number.)
- What other ways can you use ten thousands, thousands, hundreds, tens, and ones to represent a number without changing its value? (Methods might include using objects, pictorial models, and numbers, including non-standard partitioning of the number in a variety of ways.)
- Standard Description
Three Fish Limit
Students determine the number of fish that are caught when each friend catches their three fish limit.
Planting Seeds
Given 84 seeds, students determine how to put the same number of seeds in each pot.
Use multiplication and division within 100 to solve word problems in situations involving equal groups, arrays, and measurement quantities, e.g., by using drawings and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the problem.
Multiplication Unit
Circles and stars.
Students determine the solution to 6 x 3 and draw a representation of their findings using circles and stars.
Students determine if Amy will get the same total of pom-poms whether she buys packages of four pompoms or packages of seven pompoms.
The Multiplication Unit involves identifying a variety of models to represent the process of multiplication in order to learn how to use it to solve problems. Questions to answer may include:
- How do multiplication situations differ from addition situations?
- How do equal-sized groups model multiplication situations in the world outside the classroom? What real-world examples of equal-sized groups can you think of?
- How do arrays and area models represent multiplication situations in the world outside the classroom? What real-world examples of arrays can you think of?
- Given a multiplication equation, how can you create a situation to match it?
TEKS standards covered: 3.4D, 3.4E, 3.4F, 3.4G
We are using ads to support all the content of Guro Ako site. Please disable or remove ad-block. Thank you!
Grade 3 Quarter 2 Performance Tasks / All Subjects
You May Also Like

Grade 6 Quarter 3 Week 2 Daily Lesson Log

Grade 5 Quarter 3 Week 2 Daily Lesson Log

Grade 4 Quarter 3 Week 2 Daily Lesson Log

IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
GRADE 3 3RD QUARTER PERFORMANCE TASKS NO With RUBRICS ( DOWNLOAD) FREE DOWNLOAD: 3rd Quarter Self-Learning Modules (K-12) with Answer Keys FREE DOWNLOAD: Updated WHLP for 3RD QUARTER FREE DOWNLOAD: Updated SUMMATIVE TESTS for 3RD QUARTER FREE DOWNLOAD: Updated LEARNING ACTIVITY SHEETS (LAS) for 3RD QUARTER FREE DOWNLOAD:
Grade 3 15 4‐Point Informational Performance Task Writing Rubric (Grades 3‐5) Score 4 3 2 1 NS Organization/Purpose response The response has a clear and effective organizational structure, creating a sense of unity and completeness. The organizationis sustained between and within paragraphs. The response is
1. Performance Task General Rubric - Reload Open Download 2. grade 3 ela rubrics FINAL Reload Open Download 3. Grade 3 Mathematics PT.FINAL - Reload Open Download 4. Grade 3 Informational Performance Task - Reload Open Download 5. Exemplars Science Alignments Reload Open Download 6. Third Grade Reload Open Download 7. Grade 3 Assessment in Reading
Rubrics help students: Focus their efforts on completing assignments in line with clearly set expectations. Self and Peer-reflect on their learning, making informed changes to achieve the desired learning level. 3. Getting Started with Rubrics. STEP 1: Clarify task/performance expectations.
Performance tasks refer to assessment tasks that "allow learners to show what they know and are able to do in diverse ways. They may create or innovate products or do performance-based tasks [including] skill demonstrations, group presentations, oral work, multimedia presentations, and research projects.
April 22, 2021 - Performance Tasks Here are the 3rd Quarter Performance Tasks for Grades 1 - 6 with Rubrics. You may get copies of these files by simply clicking of DOWNLOAD links below. These Performance Tasks may still be improved to better fit your learners.
Types of rubrics: holistic, analytic/descriptive, single-point Holistic Rubric. A holistic rubric consists of a single scale with all the criteria to be included in the evaluation (such as clarity, organization, mechanics, etc.) being considered together.
There are several types of rubrics including holistic, analytical, general, and task-specific. Each of these will be described below. Holistic All criteria are assessed as a single score. Holistic rubrics are good for evaluating overall performance on a task. Because only one score is given, holistic rubrics tend to be easier to score.
Rubrics are sometimes called "criteria sheets", "grading schemes", or "scoring guides". It can be used for marking assignments, class participation, or overall grades. There are two types of rubrics: holistic and analytic. It can be used for marking assignments, class participation, or overall grades.
The tasks for 3rd Grade through High School were developed by the Mathematics Assessment Resource Service (MARS) of the Shell Centre for Mathematical Education, University of Nottingham, England. The tasks for 2nd Grade were developed by the Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative's Mathematics Assessment Collaborative (MAC).
All Performance task assessments results shall be recorded and will appear to the records of every learner. NOTE: YOU CAN ALSO DOWNLOAD COMPLETE QUARTER 1 PERFORMANCE TASKS JUST CLICK HERE To Download PERFORMANCE TASK to be recorded for the Second Quarter, Simply click on the following links below.
Worksheets are Performance task general rubric, Grade 3 ela rubrics final, Grade 3 mathematics, Grade 3 informational performance task, Exemplars science alignments, Third grade, Grade 3 assessment in reading, Grade 3 module 1 performance task. *Click on Open button to open and print to worksheet. 1. Performance Task General Rubric -
These performance task assessments shall be included to the Self-Learning Modules (SLMs) that will be sent to the learners. Other divisions scheduled to send these tasks separately. All Performance task assessments results shall be recorded and will appear to the records of every learner.
GRADE 3 COMPLETE QUARTER 4 PERFORMANCE TASKS WITH RUBRICS - YouTube 0:00 / 2:54 GRADE 3 COMPLETE QUARTER 4 PERFORMANCE TASKS WITH RUBRICS 6,377 views Jun 18, 2021 FOR SOFT COPY LINK:...
Description . The action verbs and phrases used to describe a task or performance are important. The description must detail the features of a successful performance—what each student should be able to do, show, or otherwise apply following a lesson or unit (do not use negative language that tells what a student is not doing). The rest of the rubric determines whether this expectation has ...
Holistic Rubric: A holistic rubrics provide a single score based on an overall impression of a student's performance on a task. ... Biology laboratory instructors agreed to use a "Biology Lab Report Rubric" to grade students' lab reports in all Biology lab sections, from 100- to 400-level. At the beginning of each semester, instructors ...
This Coordinate Plane Performance Task is an excellent summative assessment for your students. It can be given in the form of an assignment, group project or as an extension. It requires students to think outside of the box as they solve real-word and mathematical problems by graphing on the coordinate plane.
The four-point rubric uses four potential points the student can earn for each area, such as 1) strong, 2) developing, 3) emerging, and 4) beginning. To turn your rubric score into a letter grade, divide the points earned by the points possible. Example: The student earns 18 out of 20 points. 18/20 = 90 percent; 90 percent = A.
Common Core Math Performance Task for 1st Grade with Rubric. by. Miki Olsen. 5.0. (46) $4.95. PDF. Common Core Math Performance Tasks for 1st Grade. Anyone that has taught 1st grade can understand the frustration of trying to do common core performance tasks!
Free samples of math performance tasks for 3rd grade. Alignment to Common Core math standards, non-common core math, and TEKS math. Includes teacher planning sheets, math rubrics, student anchor papers, and scoring rationales. Try in your classroom or use our tools for remote teaching.
All Performance task assessments results shall be recorded and will appear to the records of every learner. Here's our Grade 3 PERFORMANCE TASK to be recorded for the Second Quarter. Note: Please log-in to your gmail account to be able to download files from the Google Drive. Download files below: You may also like: